Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Stefan Johansson

Medical Mythbusting (?) - NEC and transfusions

Recommended Posts

In case you have not yet read the blog post below by Michael Narvey, do it!

In my twitter feed I just read about the very recent meta-analysis of transfusion-associated NEC

From the original paper:


In short, the concept of "TANEC" seems just so poorly researched, as The average rating for the quality of evidence of individual studies was between "very low" and "low."

In short, confounding by indication is the likely conceptual mistake here.

Here's the pubmed URL to the paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27866662 



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

My interpretation of the GRADE review is to ignore the pooled estimates for the observational studies for sure because of the poor quality.  The issue is, as Stefan highlights, confounding by indication.  The available RCT data do not support transfusion as increasing risk of NEC.  I think the most elegant study to try and better understand what is going on and by-pass the confounding by indication study is the JAMA https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=26934258 where they are able to parse out anemia from transfusion.  I am still only a fellow, but I base my transfusion practice vis a vis NEC risk on the RCT data from the GRADE review and this paper highlighting the anemia as the key feature. This conclusion is consistent with the finding in the RCTs of less NEC in the liberal transfusion group because the liberal transfusion group would presumably have less (and likely less severe) anemia. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this