Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello Everyone,

I am intrigued to learn what your views are on determining whether reticulocyte counts have a bearing on your decision to transfuse or not, and whether or not you have a set guideline. Thanks

Alistair

Posted
...whether reticulocyte counts have a bearing on your decision to transfuse or not, and whether or not you have a set guideline.

Hi!

I have no fixed protocol for this topic but personally (and I think that my colleagues share this opinion) is to check both Hb, EVF and reticulocytes when we check for anemia in "recovering" preterm infants. If reticulocytes are low and Hb/EVF can be accepted (and the baby is gaining weight and is reasonably well/stable of course!), I try to postpone a transfusion as much as possible to stimulate reticulocyte production. Similarly, high reticulocytes and an acceptable Hb/EVF... same strategy.

When I come to think of this... we try hard to postpone all tranfusions, we only give erytrocytes when we feel anemia is truly "symtomatic" (whatever that may mean :))

Posted

I have the same 'strategy' as Stefan. Usually I try to postpone transfusions as much as possible, and if the reticulocytes count is high, I try even harder. I managed to avoid transfusions many times with the 'help' of reticulocytes count (situations I wouldn't wait anymore, unless the retic count is high).

Posted

Recently, I've attended a lecture discussing the issue of PRBC's transfusion . Some Neonatologist think we "wait" too much .. I liked what Stefan said about symptomatic , whatever that means!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...