Jump to content


Want to join the discussions?

Sign up for a free membership! 

If you are a member already, log in!

(lost your password? reset it here)

99nicu.org 99nicu.org


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

  • Country

    United States

HickOnACrick last won the day on January 26

HickOnACrick had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

29 Excellent

About HickOnACrick

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • First name
  • Last name
  • Gender
  • Occupation
  • Affiliation
    Covenant Women and Children
  • Location
    Lubbock, TX

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. As of yesterday, baby has continued to wean slowly on HFNC. FiO2 needs are mostly <40% on 3 LPM. Most importantly, baby has started bottle-feeding. We were very concerned about oral aversion. Baby remains on caffeine, multivitamin with iron, and Pulmicort NEB BID. Baby is gaining weight on a mixture of EBM and Neosure. When we have a baby that seems to be failing on HFNC, we generally move them over to NBCPAP or NIPPV, but we have used increased LPM flows (>5 LPM) on occasion. I have colleagues in other NICUs that prefer using HFNC at 6-8 LPM vs NBCPAP.
  2. I use NaCl or NaAcetate in TPN. I can't remember the last time I used NaPO4. It is an option, but we do not use it often. We do not routinely check electrolytes until day 2-3, nor do we routinely add any supplements other than Ca and protein the first 2 days. What is happening with the weight of your babies that experience this hypernatremia? What about the urine output? A low UOP and substantial weight drop could imply lack if intravascular free water.
  3. Here is our initial fluid management strategy: <750 grams = 120 mL/kg/day 750 - 1000 grams - 110 mL/kg/day 1001 - 1500 grams = 100 mL/kg/day We use 0.25 or 0.5 Normal saline in our UAC lines, running at 0.5-1 mL/hr. We do not routinely see hypernatremia in the first week, transient hyponatremia from immature renal function seems more common to us. Outside of the UAC fluids, our babies do not see Na in their maintenance fluids until 2-3 days of life. Hope this helps
  4. We have had 4 confirmed subgaleal hemorrhages (SH) in the past couple of months. We have long suspected that many caputs have an element of SH, but avoid CT imaging due to the radiation and that identifying a SH will not change our management in most cases, if the baby is otherwise doing well. Of the 4 recent cases of SH, 2 have had more severe intracranial bleeding (intraventricular and subdural hemorrhages) and skull fractures - one of which was depressed. One of the cases was clearly in need of further head imaging on admission, due to the clinical picture, but the other was muc
  5. Going off service for a week, so an update. Baby has continued to slowly improve. Baby is now on HFNC 4LPM with oxygen needs around 30%, remains on full enteral feeds, fortified, and is gaining weight again. We may need to prolong the steroid course. As the course has weaned, baby's FiO2 needs have increased slightly (we have had the baby as low as 25% FiO2). The most recent chest radiograph shows improved expansion and aeration. Fibrosis and chronic changes are not the worst we have seen. We would not define the most recent CXR as being consistent with c
  6. I have found a few case reports about NICU graduates with BPD being admitted to PICUs with Covid-19. However, I have yet to find a case report of a former ELBW infant, who is still in the NICU, acquiring SARS-CoV-2, and deteriorating as a consequence. With regards to publishing, well, that is in part why I started this thread. It seemed like I was observing a novel effect of a novel virus, but wanted to see if others were seeing it as well. I reached out to my local University NICU's Medical Director, and they have not seen it in their NICUs. I have a couple other calls in to othe
  7. We also use: (weight in kg x 3) + 9 + length of cord This gives us an approximation of UAC depth. Half of UAC length approximates UVC depth. We use an AP radiograph to confirm placement. There is a method by which one can use the cardiorespiratory monitor to determine position of the UVC. Essentially you set the monitor to give an auditory beep with each heart beat. Advance the UVC until the frequency of beeps decreases (this implies the tip of the UVC is at the SA node), then pull the UVC back about 1/2 cm and it should be in a pretty good position. However, those I h
  8. Most I have worked with, including myself, will begin TPN as soon as possible in VLBW and ELBW babies, even with babies that have evidence of metabolic acidosis. In the larger babies, we are more likely to start a "clear" solution of trophamine, dextrose and calcium, or even just a straight dextrose solution - initially. To control blood glucose levels, mostly we can get by with just adjusting the IV rate until we can order a new bag of TPN (once daily). If adjusting the rate is not working (or we have reached a rate we are not comfortable with), we will "Y-in" an appropriate dext
  9. Former 27 weeker, 895 gram male (now 1700+ and 36 and 6/7). STAT C-section for abruption, Apgars 1/3/5. Suspected antepartum anoxia/hypoxemia based on blood gases. Developed renal failure, elevated transaminases, etc. Very difficult respiratory mgmt, at 2 months of life, still on 5LPM HFNC and 50% FiO2 which is far outside the norm for us. This weekend, increased frequency and severity of apnea prompted a septic workup, including viral respiratory panel by RT-PCR. Negative for all the common resp viruses (including RSV, metapneumo, and flu), negative blood culture (now day 3), but
  10. Sad day. In spite of our best efforts, we have been unable to get this baby to ventilate and oxygenate. This morning, on a MAP of 10.5, this was the CXR: Last night we tried a mixture of milrinone and dobutamine to increase cardiac output and open the pulmonary vascular bed, but this made our oxygenation and ventilation worse. We stopped those meds and the baby did fairly well overnight with respect to his blood gases, and we were able to wean the amplitude somewhat. The echo yesterday showed a small PFO shunting left to right, but otherwise, no significant pathology. Throughou
  11. Here is the CXR when the baby's MAP was 12: Here is the CXR when the MAP was 8: Clearly the hyperexpansion and air trapping are much worse on the second CXR with a lower MAP. Per @Miguel Pantoja we increased the MAP from 8 to 10 and have now weaned to 80% with SpO2 in the low 90s. We will continue to wean FiO2 until we reach a nadir, then slowly increase the MAP to a maximum of 12, while trying to wean the amplitude, then we will try and be patient and let the lungs heal if oxygenating and ventilating reasonably well. Ideally, I would like to get the amplitude
  12. We started steroids 5 days ago, albeit the low-dose DART protocol of dexamethasone. I am about to start Milrinone and dobutamine to improve cardiac function. Thanks for your input.
  13. We got the Hz down to 6, but our first attempt to wean the amplitude resulted in a pretty significant respiratory acidosis. What is really strange is that in spite of weaning the MAP from its original 14 to now 8, the hyperexapnsion by CXR is getting worse. I speculate that the air leak is not healing at all, and we essentially have thousands of little tension pneumothoraces surrounding what little areas of gas exchange the baby has; I wouldn't really call them alveoli at 24 weeks. Awaiting an echo now to assess shunting and see if an argument can be made to increase contractility w
  14. You may already be doing all of the following, but these are some of the things we do to prevent CLABSI: 1. TPN changes are performed as a sterile procedure; nobody is allowed within 10 feet of the bedspace without hat and mask. The RN doing the change is gowned up, hat, mask and sterile gloves. Of course, new tubing with every change of TPN 2. Standardized feeding guidelines to prevent days with a CVL in place 3. Minimizing breaks into the line for medications. Medications such as caffeine are changed to po as soon as baby demonstrates ability to tolerate po feeds (at about 60
  15. Thank you everyone for your input. In spite of continuing to lower the MAP, the CXR remains hyperexpanded. Base deficit slowly worsened throughout the day, although BP remained acceptable. The Hct is stable at 45%. I gave 20/kg of isotonic bicarbonate last night for a base deficit of -10, and the pH and base deficit improved. Awaiting another CXR this morning, if it still looks hyperexpanded, I will focus more on decreasing Hz. There seems to be some disagreement in what limited literature I can find (mostly opinions) as to whether a Hz of 12-15 or Hz of 6-9 is more beneficial. Anecdotal
  • Create New...