dreamhoneys Posted March 22, 2009 Posted March 22, 2009 I am writing a new guideline for nasogastric feeding, to include confirming placement of an ng tube. I would like to dictate the use of a 10ml syringe for aspiration because of the lower pressure but I cannot find the evidence base related to this. There are many other guidelines stating the use of 10ml syringes, but again they do not include any evidence base. Can anyone point me in the right direction please?
R. Hentschel Posted March 31, 2009 Posted March 31, 2009 For aspiration of gastric volumes we would use a smaller syringe (5 ml) unless you expect a volume of 20 ml or so. In terms of physics, I think you must differentiate between positive pressure and negative pressure. If you push the piston of a syringe forwards the force that you exert is pressure divided by diameter of the piston. However, the negative pressure that you apply is simply the amount of vacuum in the syringe. If you pull the piston back by the same distance (for instance 6mm) you get a higher vacuum and a higher negative pressure in a 10 ml syringe (with a bigger piston) than in a 2 ml syringe (with a smaller piston). This holds true at least for the situation, where the tip of the tube adheres to the mucosa. And that is exactly the situation that you have to avoid, because otherwise you perform an involuntary biopsy. I would prefer the smaller syringe and give the advice to pull back the piston very slowly. We have seen small point mucosal bleedings on gastroscopy in newborns that probably resulted from too big aspiration forces.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now